It’s a Market Researcher’s nightmare.
You are presenting some new, important research results to a room of 10, 20 or maybe even more decision makers. People for whom the research was executed. The ones who are supposed to take the research and apply it to important business decisions and strategies.
You’re 5 minutes into it, and it happens: the cynic takes the stage (well, figuratively). And you know the difference between this person and someone asking a reasonable question. It’s in the attitude, the tone. A hint of superiority, or obviously feigned earnestness.
The market research cynic is a wily creature. They say things like:
“How do you really know the respondents were qualified?”
“I would never do a survey, so I don’t believe any of our valuable customers would either…these respondents must all be outliers.”
“I recently read about the blahblah methodology which is clearly superior…how come you didn’t use that?”
Even if you can objectively, credibly address these issues, the cynic has now derailed your presentation. The momentum is gone. The audience has lost interest or may just feel uncomfortable.
So what to do? I mean, without resorting to rude comebacks.
How to Handle Market Research Cynics
In my experience, here is what works:
- Identify and meet with likely cynics at least 2 days before the actual presentation. The truth is, they may very well have valid concerns. Addressing them in private will reduce the risk of having your presentation derailed. In fact, I have had some of my most intolerable cynics turn into some of my strongest supporters.
- Prepare preemptive strikes. At the presentation, be sure to make the following statements early on before anyone asks any questions:
- How respondents were qualified (a common question)
- Sample size and any important quotas (addresses data reliability concerns)
- WHO in your organization participated in the decisions about sample size, screening criteria and quota requirements (helps avoid second-guessing of decisions that were obviously made long ago)
- The exact goals the research was designed to address (this keeps people from asking questions like, “How come you didn’t ask about XYZ?”)
- WHO in your organization participated in decisions about the research’s goals (hopefully someone who is respected and has authority)
- A statement acknowledging that research is not perfect (it isn’t), but that it’s pretty darn good, and how they can appropriately use these results (for example, is the data suitable for extrapolation? Or is it more directional?)
In my experience, most market research cynics are simply people who have been burned in the past by bad research. It happens. So they need to be shown ample evidence that this research was done thoughtfully, with the best possible choice of sample source, methodology, and analysis techniques.
Who knows, you may find that today’s research cynics will become tomorrow’s research advocates.
[Please add any feedback or questions here, or call the Blog Requests line at 508.691.6004. Thanks!]